Friday, January 20, 2012

Mets Fan Bids Kid Adieu



February 17, 2012 - Chicago


I was finishing my prep for tonight's Celtics game in Chicago when the news came. A few miles from where Gary Carter hit his 300th home run in the summer of 1988, an quest which had become such a Tim Wakefield-aian struggle at the end, David Letterman did a whole bit on it later than night. The outpouring of obituary affection was overwhelming and at some level comforting. Almost as much as the knowledge that his pain was finally over.  Such a bittersweet moment to think that more than once in 1985, Gary Carter and Whitney Houston were the two best parts of my teenage day.


I wrote this last month, when things seemed most grave.  It was an ode, and a paying of due respect.  But really, it was therapy for me and maybe at some level, that ridiculous, youth-inspired backwards sports-thought that you could jinx something from happening, merely by saying it out loud.


It didn't work.


But the Empire State Building, which I could see out of my window every day growing up, bright with Mets blue and orange on Friday night was the best tribute of all.


He had a way of brightening up everything.






January 20, 2012


This should have been a fun Thursday night.  The Lakers and Heat are on.  We had Penguins-Rangers, no Rob Lowe tweets and the unintentional comedy of both Fausto Carmona, and pretty much every Republican candidate pretending to be someone else.
But I can’t shake the story that’s gotten lost in the always-frenetic news cycle.
Gary Carter is dying.
I can’t believe I have to type that.
Nor do I know why life-is-unfair moments continue to catch me off guard.  But this one truly has.
*******
We’ve spent the last couple of months, celebrating, canonizing, debating, appreciating, bashing, and then appreciating all the bashing of a player who plays the game with an indomitable joy and a faith he feels compelled to share.  But as fascinating and must-see TV as the year of the Tebow has been. I enjoyed it more the first time I saw it three decades ago.  It was called Gary Carter.
He was the National League’s all-star catcher, after Johnny Bench and before Mike Piazza.  He was the centerpiece of the two of the decade’s great teams.  The early 80’s Expos and the mid/late 80’s Mets.
But he was different. It’s one thing for a rookie to get the nickname “Kid”. It’s another when a burly catcher in mid 30’s not only keeps it, but earns it every day.
Our collective national snark wasn’t as honed in the 80’s.  I mean, my God, just look at the hair.  How cynical could we possibly have been?
Bobby Bonilla famously told the New York media when he arrived twenty years ago that they couldn’t knock the smile off his face.  That had a Kim Kardashian marriage kind of chance.  And lasted about as long.
Carter seemed immune to it.  He seemed to have a Kenneth-the-30 Rock-page, aw-shucks immunity to it.  He chased foul balls he couldn’t possible reach, he dove into the stands and every Shea Stadium curtain call looked like Kevin Garnett winning a championship. And he never shied away from thanking the Lord on the post-game show, no matter how cringe-worthy.
With our conflict-seeking trained eyes now, we can probably see Keith Hernandez and the more too cool for school element of the dugout rolling their eyes at Carter. The same way Red Sox teammates would snipe off the record about Curt Schilling years later.
I remember a DL stint for Carter late in the ’86 season in which Tim McCarver and Steve Zabriskie had him up in the TV booth. He was so bottled up from not being able to play, I don’t think he stopped talking for like six full innings. It was Walton-esque. 
We all work with someone like that.  They’re just a little too enthusiastic, a little too rah-rah. Not one of the cool kids, and kind of an easy target.  But you miss them when they’re gone, because they made you work harder, or play harder, or just enjoy more being part of a team.
Gary Carter was that guy. 
He used to scream at his teammates, “You’re the man!”
When really, he was.
In the old days, when there was only one ESPN, one Game of the Week, and you did your fantasy league stats every Tuesday when USA Today printed the stats, baseball’s winter meetings were in mid-December, the week of my birthday.  So every year, as a Met fan, I’d get someone new for my birthday. At least that’s how I looked at with the limitless myopia of youth.
By 1984, Frank Cashen the Mets GM had been stockpiling assets for years, meticulously building the farm system to make the one big deal.  That December, he had enough to go shopping at the big boy store.  And the Expos, foreshadowing and pre-dating  the departure of Andre Dawson, Pedro Martinez and Vladimir Guerrero, were ready to deal their franchise catcher.
We loved Hubie Brooks, loved him, but I would have driven him to the airport myself.  Were I old enough to have a car…or a license.  Keith Hernandez had changed the culture in the Mets clubhouse, but Carter legitimized it.  The result, was baseball nirvana.  Dwight Gooden, Darryl Strawberry, Lenny Dykstra, Wally Backman, Jesse Orosco and Roger McDowell, as motley and wild a crew as has ever been assembled, now had a heart.
I get it, everyone hated the Mets.  The way they hated the Yankees of the late 70’s, the Celtics of the late 2000’s, the Broad Street Bully Flyers, the cast of Jersey Shore.
Jeff Pearlman famously wrote the story of the mid 80’s Mets, it was called “The Bad Guys Won.”  There should have been asterisk for the catcher.
He was a leader from the first day.  The walk-off home run in his first game as a Met against Neil Allen and the Cardinals.  I was there that day, finding out first-hand what happens when both an all-star catcher anchors your lineup, and you sit at Shea Stadium for three hours in mid20’s April wind-chill. The results of both are devastating.  He had, by the way, ruined Opening Day the year before, hitting a grand slam in a 10-0 Expos rout.  Now he was my birthday present.  He was on my side.
The stats, the hall of fame career?  They’re all on Baseball Reference. 
The 1-2-3 double plays, the purely genuine fist-pumps, riding those bad wheels into second on a double. I watched every minute of the Mets’ six hour game in Atlanta on July 4, 1985.  I watched it.  Gary Carter caught it…all 19 innings. 
When Mookie Wilson nearly lost his eye in spring training in 1987, when a rundown throw shattered his sunglasses, Carter was the first one to rush to his side.  “Aw geez, did it break the glass?  It did.”  He was devastated because his teammate, had gotten hurt.
These are the things I remember.
Before we had Wikipedia, and YouTube and every conceivable sports moment cataloged at our fingertips, we relied on our own childhood memories, and by not having to go to either to write these words, I realized today how much Gary Carter is a part of mine. And how much I appreciate it.
We seem to have great skill and grace when it comes to the posthumous homage. 
But I’m writing this tonight on the hopes he’ll see it.  On the hopes that rather than write an obituary, he could know how much one fan loved to watch him play, and will always remember not just 1986, and a World Series win one teenager who grew up watching Mets teams lose 95 games a year never even dared to dream, but the everyday love of the game that came through the television decades before HD.
But mostly on the hopes he can beat out one more base hit it doesn't seem like he can.
From me as a kid, to the actual Kid.
Thanks.

Sunday, January 15, 2012

10,000 Maniacs: These are the Twitter days

January 15, 2012 - 12:30am


So as it turns out, we hit this big Twitter milestone at 30,00o feet.

Which is kind of fitting as I’ve spent every imaginable holiday, birthday, anniversary, award show, election night and Family Guy marathon day six miles in the air.  In fact, the only thing I remember being on the ground for was the Millennium twelve years ago.

And that’s only because they thought all the planes were going to crash.  Y2K…those were the days.

But this is about 10K, not Y2K, as in the landmark 10,000 follower threshold they tell me is some kind Ron Burgandy big deal in Twitter world.

Here’s the thing.  It’s really not.  And before I get to why it’s not, and what is kind of a big deal, can I just say what no one else seems to?  That “follower” is kind of creepy.  A kind of creepy, ill-fitting term.  What am I, the King of Siam or something? 

Who came up with this?  What about subscriber?  What about member?  And what about what it really is…customer. 

I mean, if people that read our tweets are followers, that would make those who tweet leaders. And based on what I’ve seen around this neighborhood?  Yeah, not so much. If Twitter follower-ship was the measure of leadership, President Obama’s cabinet meetings would have would have Katie Perry and Shakira arguing about middle class tax cuts and Ashton Kutcher taking digital pictures of it with his Nikon.

Listen, I was pulled reluctantly into this world, as most men of certain age are when the impetuousness of youth is replaced with a lethal combination of skepticism, fear of the unknown and the stubborn refusal to accept that the way you’ve always done things, is not going to be the way you can do them in the future.

Evolve, or die.

Why my reticence?  Well, I figured 140 characters for me was like watching Kwame Brown try to squeeze into those short-shorts for the Lakers a few years ago.  An uncomfortably tight squeeze, and not very pretty to look at.

I mean, we’re 350 words in here and I haven’t even approached the point.  Haven’t even sidled up near it. 

I’m a broadcaster.  So anyone who uses one word when they could just as easily use ten just isn’t trying hard enough.

But let’s arrive at the point; I really am humbled by there being 10,000 of you.  For a variety of reasons. 

The strangest one being this, I know some of you, maybe a majority of you, have never actually seen or heard me do what it is, I really do.

See, I’m a play-by-play guy.  That’s what I do.  It’s what I’ve always done.  I can’t sing or dance, I can’t heal, I can’t litigate, I can’t pilot.  I call games.

But in that role as the voice of the Boston Celtics, and various in sundry free-lance assignments, no one has ever promoted me as being on Twitter.  You’ve never seen my name at the bottom of any screen with the little blue bird.  My handle, is that what we’ve decided to call it?  My handle doesn’t appear on the Celtics website, on our TV partner Comcast Sportsnet, now a proud part of the NBC Sports family.  I’m rarely on TV these days, I don’t host Sportscenter, or a daily talk show.

I have become, quite accidentally, a Louis Winthorp-ian sociological experiment in this purely democratic medium of Twitter.

If you’re there, it’s strictly on word-of-mouth, or word-of-tweet I guess, as it were.  You might be into the Celtics, the NBA, WWE, college hockey or just like a good LeBron, Tebow or Brett Favre joke once in a while.  You’re probably a fan of Bill Simmons, or Jim Ross, Michele Beadle, Mick Foley, Robert Flores, Joey Styles, Adrian Wojnarowski, Dave Lagana or any of my high-profile friends who type softly but carry a big twitter stick.

But you found me, the same way you’ve found all the other cool stuff out here that you enjoy and you make the decision to say, in a way that makes us deeply proud; “This person does not irritate me to a level that I can’t even stand to have their random thoughts delivered to my handheld personal device for free.”

It is quite the ego stroke.

But like a Clint Eastwood-grumpy-old-man character that eventually has to admit that the new thing he was afraid of is actually a welcome change and some kind of full-circle, third-act object lesson, I have to say, this is pretty cool.

All the other elements of being on the air, or being a “star” (and I’m talking about Gaga and Beiber here, not me.  Well, probably Beadle, too), have always been about creating an imaginary divide between celebrity and us “regular people”.  But the unintentionally subversive byproduct of Twitter, is that we’re all the same.  We look the same, we have the same character limit and the single best part…

Access.

I’m on the Celtics plane right now, if I wanted to ask Paul Pierce a question about, well, anything, I can get up, walk five feet and ask him.  But now, you can too.  And chances are he’ll see it, and maybe even answer.

Look, I’m not nor am I likely to ever be, if I may crib from my former work colleague Antoine Walker, a high-volume-tweeter. But I will do my best to answer ever tweet as quickly as I can.  It’s the least I can do.  Why?

Because what I’m saying, in something more than 140 characters, is that as far as I’m concerned, I…follow you.  And if I can inform, amuse, answer a question or tweet a picture of Max eating a snow cone during the second quarter, I’ll do my best.

And continue to strive to be the Egg McMuffin of Twitter.


Wednesday, December 28, 2011

TWO DOWN AND...WELL...TWO DOWN

Some notes from 30,000 feet on a less than ideal Celtics start…



Not brain surgery through two games but to paraphrase a former President who grew up in this part of the country…

It’s the defense, stupid.

After four years as the NBA’s best defensive team, the Celtics have started out as anything but in 2011-2012.  All the obvious asterisks aside, short training camp, new bench, tough road schedule and of course, the subtraction of their leading scorer and captain Paul Pierce aside, some pretty jarring numbers.

For example…

·         Last year, the Celtics were 26-0 when scoring 104 points. This year, 0-2. 

·         Last year, the Celtics were 36-4 when shooting 50%. This year, 0-2. 

·         Last year, the Celtics trailed by 17 just five times in 82 games. This year, 2-2..


Here’s the big one….


·         At one point late in the 3rd quarter, the Heat were shooting 70% from the floor.  The Celtics zone cooled them off, but it was still one of the worst defensive efforts of the 4+ year era.



OPPONENT FIELD GOAL PERCENTAGE – NEW BIG 3 ERA

.580 - VS. TORONTO – JANUARY 23, 2008

.574`- VS. DALLAS – JANUARY 18, 2010

.560 - @ MIAMI – DECEMBER 27, 2011

.559 - VS. PHOENIX – MARCH 26, 2008 (W)

.557 - VS. TORONTO – NOVEMBER 27, 2009 (W)

.557 - @ PHILADELPHIA – DECEMBER 5, 2007 (W)

.557 - @ DETROIT – DECEMBER 29, 2010

.551 - @ CLEVELAND – APRIL 12, 2009

.550 - VS. MEMPHIS – MARCH 10, 2010



·         It was the 16th time C’s have gone down by 20 in the New Big Three era…five of the 16 to a LeBron James team.



20-POINT DEFICITS – NEW BIG 3 ERA (REGULAR SEASON)

36 - @ CLEVELAND – APRIL 12, 2009

29 - VS. MEMPHIS – MARCH 10, 2010

29 - @ HOUSTON – MARCH 18, 2011

28 - VS. WASHINGTON – APRIL 9, 2010

25 - @ INDIANA – NOVEMBER 1, 2008

25 - VS. SAN ANTONIO – MARCH 28, 2010

23 - @ PHOENIX – DECEMBER 30, 2009

23 - VS. L.A. CLIPPERS – MARCH 9, 2011

23 - @ MIAMI – APRIL 10, 2011

22 - @ SAN ANTONIO – MARCH 17, 2008 (W)

22 - VS. ORLANDO – MARCH 8, 2009

20 - @ ORLANDO – NOVEMBER 18, 2007

20 - @ CLEVELAND – JANUARY 9, 2009

20 - @ DENVER – FEBRUARY 21, 2010

20 - VS. CLEVELAND – FEBRUARY 25, 2010

20 - @ MIAMI – DECEMBER 27, 2011



·         Celtics only made 12 3’s once last year, against Sacramento in the blizzard game on Jan, 12.  They haven’t made more than 12 since November of 2009, part of the hot start to the ’09-’10 season,  It was the 20th time in the New Big Three Era the Celtics had made at least 12 3’s, they had been 17-2 in the previous 19.

3pt FIELD GOALS – NEW BIG 3 ERA

16 - VS. DALLAS – JANUARY 25, 2009

15 - @ MEMPHIS – MARCH 8, 2008

15 - @ MIAMI – JANUARY 21, 2009

14 - VS. PHILADELPHIA – JANUARY 18, 2008

14 - @ PORTLAND – FEBRUARY 24, 2008

14 - @ CHICAGO – APRIL 1, 2008

14 - @ DENVER – FEBRUARY 23, 2009

14 - @ PHILADELPHIA – NOVEMBER 3, 2009

13 - @ WASHINGTON – APRIL 9, 2008 (L)

13 - @ INDIANA – DECEMBER 7, 2008

12 - @ TORONTO – NOVEMBER 4, 2007*

12 - VS. NEW YORK – NOVEMBER 29, 2007

12 - VS. CHICAGO – DECEMBER 21, 2007

12 - vs. Chicago – december 19. 2008

12 - VS. WASHINGTON – JANUARY 2, 2009

12 - VS. NEW JERSEY – JANUARY 14, 2008

12 - VS. CHICAGO – OCTOBER 30, 2009

12 - @ ORLANDO – JANUARY 28, 2010 (L)

12 - VS. SACRAMENTO – JANUARY 12, 2011

12 - @ MIAMI – DECEMBER 27, 2011 (L)



 But let’s also remember that as dominant as the Celtics have been, the Christmas road trip has not been their friend since winning the championship in 2008.  The Celtics go into New Orleans on Wednesday 3-10 in their last 13 games on the Christmas trip.

2008 - 1-3 including the Christmas loss to the Lakers and the controversial “6 men on the court” loss in Portland.

2009 - 1-3, the start of the uninspired 27-27 finish to the regular season.

2010 - 1-2 plus the injury to Kevin Garnett

2011 - 0-2 start 



So yes, by the way, this is what I do at 2:23am, five miles above the gulf. 

Hug your kids close this holiday week, and hope for a better life for them.

The plane is beginning its descent. 

No doubt more than a few right now think the Celtics are as well.  We’ll see.

We’ll talk to you at 7:30 eastern time tonight from New Orleans on NBA.com and WEEI. 

Saturday, December 17, 2011

NBA OPENING WEEK: IT'S THE STRENGTH OF SCHEDULE...NOT THE LENGTH.

There’s been a ton of debate, and consternation about the 66-game schedule upon which the NBA is about to embark.  And virtually all of it, is about the volume of games being “crammed” into a short amount of time.  And while it’s factual, two things to remember; the number of games only went “up” by ten percent  (3.7/week as opposed to 3.4) and it will be the same for everyone.

What’s getting no mention, is the change in strength of schedule.  And the fact that the unbalanced schedule will give certain teams an advantage and others, not so much.

Here’s what I mean.  57 of the 66 games will be the same for everyone (assuming that the East and West are relatively balanced, discuss amongst yourselves).  Everyone will play 3 games against teams from their own conference and 1 against teams from the other conference. 

The leaves nine games.

Can nine make that much of a difference from one team to the next?

You decide.

It was unavoidable that the marquee teams would play more marquee games. But how does that play out.  CBS Sports’ computer said the Celtics and Heat would have the toughest schedule.  And a look at their extra nine games shows us why.  But how does that compare to another, under-the-radar playoff contender?  Let’s take a look.


For example, my dark horse in the East is Indiana.  Small-market team, young, unknown head coach, so in theory, not a great television draw.  What do the Pacers’ nine extra games look like compared to the Celtics and Heat?  Do your own tale-of-the-tape.

2011-2002 NINE EXTRA GAME OPPONENTS

BOSTON                               MIAMI                                  INDIANA

LA LAKERS                            LA LAKERS                            GOLDEN STATE

DALLAS                                  DALLAS                                  MINNESOTA

OKLAHOMA CITY                OKLAHOMA CITY               NEW ORLEANS

MIAMI                                    BOSTON                                 CLEVELAND

CHICAGO                               CHICAGO                              NEW JERSEY

WASHINGTON                     ORLANDO                             ORLANDO

TORONTO                              PHILADELPHIA                  PHILADELPHIA

INDIANA                               ATLANTA                               BOSTON

NEW YORK                            INDIANA                               MIAMI


It’s almost as dramatic for the Lakers in the West, whose extra games include Boston, Miami, New York and Dallas.

They say this season will be like no other in NBA history.

Looking at things like this…makes me think they’re right.

Friday, December 16, 2011

STONE COLD DVD REVIEW - WWE.COM

(Originally written for wwe.com, December 16, 2011)


Every hall of fame athlete has indelible moments.

They’re what you see in slow-motion on Sportscenter over and over.

But without exception, those moments were born of passion, unparalleled work ethic and debilitating emotional and physical setbacks that had to be overcome.

In the new WWE DVD release, “Stone Cold Steve Austin”, we get to see how the Texas rattlesnake was no different.

The broad sketches of the Steve Austin are already legend.  The early days in Dallas, learning both the business and how to live on a budget.  The tumultuous years in WC, extraordinary in-ring work combined with the ever-frustrating politics.  The life-raft and free-reign of ECW that served as the turn from what was to what would be.  And the misguided start at WWE (The Ringmaster…Fang McFrost?) until a cup of hot tea, and the years of lessons learned led him to find his voice…and change the business.

But the DVD tells us why.

History is concrete.  But the moments that make are wet cement that could dry any number of ways.  “Stone Cold Steve Austin, the bottom line of the most popular superstar of all time” takes us to the moment that very nearly changed that history, the tombstone piledriver that went horribly worng at Summerslam ’97.

All of it leading to the Stone Cold Era that even now fans of John Cena and C.M. Punk happily replay in the DVD machine in their minds.

All-time classic matches with Bret Hart, Mick Foley and the Rock, resonating with the sound track of Jim Ross.

And the unforgettable Raw history of the most unusual, and maybe most successful feud of all-time with Mr. McMahon, one of bedlam, bedpans and beer trucks.

We hear from the all the key players in the evolution, Paul Heyman, Mick Foley, Bret Hart, Vince McMahon, Pat Patterson and Jerry Brisco. All of whom played their parts perfectly.

But maybe the best part of the DVD is the constantly recurring theme.  That while it’s ostensibly the story of one man, one hall-of-fame superstar, the lesson is what happens when a promotion rallies around a star, and that star shines bright enough to put everyone on the team in the light.  In 1996 and 1997, WWE was in a life-and-death struggle with WCW.  The Stone Cold phenomenon put the spotlight back on WWE where a roster of future hall-of-famers was already delivering a better product.  The WWE and the roster helped make Stone Cold, and he in turn, made everyone on the roster better.

That’s how championships, and Monday Night Wars, are won.

And that’s when wrestling leaves its fans indelible images of an era they won’t forget.

I’ve been courtside for Game 7 of the NBA Finals, I’ve been lucky enough to call New Year’s Day bowls and national championship games.  They were never louder than the moment before a Stone Cold match when the glass broke.

You can talk about Sammartino, Andre, Flair, Hogan and the Rock.

But on wrestling’s Mount Rushmore, they’re all fighting for the spots next to Steve Austin.

I’m not sure we’d be saying the same about Fang McFrost

Sunday, December 4, 2011

Celtics and the Unbalanced Schedule - Nov, 27, 2011

Posted on Twitter - November 27, 2011

Halftime break from watching Sanchez throw picks, one example of how the new NBA schedule changes?  Inter-conference play. 



Here’s what I mean.



If, and that’s a big if, the West is a tougher, deeper conference than the East has been the case for most of this new millennium, then the Celtics will benefit from a schedule that will nor feature more inter-conference games.  In a normal year, teams play 63% of their schedule against their own conference.  With 12 of the 16 games being cut from the schedule being against the teams from the other conference, that number now jumps to 73%.



How much shuffling of the original schedule will have to be done? Probably more than we realized.  While home dates will largely remain intact, opponents will have to be shifted around quite a bit.  For example, after Christmas, the Celtics would have had 25 games left Vs. the Western Conference.  That number now gets cut to 18.  So of the 13 home games originally schedules against western teams in 2012, four of them will now be changed to eastern teams.  And if, for another example, that changes visits from San Antonio and Dallas to say, Washington and Charlotte, you do the math.



Six western teams will not visit the Garden this year and the Celtics will not visit six western cities.



Just some morsels to digest while we wait for real news…like an actual schedule, the free-agent period or any international incidents J.R. Smith is causing around the globe.

Celtics and the Short Season - Nov. 26, 2011

Posted on Twitter - November 26, 2011

To commemorate today, the return of the innocuous Celtics stat. One that starts the debate on whether a short season helps or hurts.



The first, is the sobering realization that the Celtics (and everyone else I suppose) have lost the first two months of the season, a period of the season they have dominated at historic levels the last four years.



CELTICS – NEW BIG 3 ERA (2007-2011)



Games before Christmas: 94 -14 (.870)

Games after Christmas:  140-80 (.636)



Translation; They Celtics have been a 71-win team before Christmas, and a 52-win team afterwards.



Now, is that a factor of the lights, home-heavy early schedule, fresh bodies?  It will be interesting to see which pattern holds in the first few weeks.



We still haven’t seen the new schedule, but it will likely feature a healthy diet of back-to-back games.  For the first two-plus years of the New Big 3 Era, there was a misconception that the older Celtics struggled.  It wasn’t the case, but in the last two years, and in particular the second half of last year, it seemed to be catching up with them.



Back to backs 2007-2009: 29-6 (.829) (.767 with rest)

Back to backs 2009-2011:  19-28 (.404) (.744 with rest)

Last 10 back to backs: 2-8



So while most have felt the short season would help the Celtics, I’ve been skeptical given the struggles last year in back-to-backs.  But let’s remember that the last time we had the truncated season, in 1999, the regular season was more like the NHL’s, a race just to make the playoffs where momentum, not home-court, ruled the day,  The Knicks, an 8-seed, went all the way to the Finals.



So does the 66-game season, in the Celtics 66th NBA season, help or hurt?



The real answer is, we have no idea because we don’t know what the Celtics will look like after the free-agent frenzy begins in two weeks.  But what we do know is that there’s NBA basketball again, so let debates like this begin.